Jonathan Glazer’s speech at the 2024 Oscars from the Zone of Interest divides opinion
Jonathan Glazer (right), winner of best international feature film for “The Zone of Interest,” poses with producer James Wilson.
Jeff Kravitz/Film Magic
Jonathan Glazer’s fiery Oscar acceptance speech Area of interest The director referenced the conflict between Israel and Gaza and said he refuted “the hijacking of Judaism and the Holocaust by the occupation,” prompting a backlash on social media.
In his prepared speech to accept the 2024 Academy Award for Best International Film, Glazer thanked his partners Area of interest, a painful film about Auschwitz and the Holocaust, then made a statement addressing his work and referring to the conflict between Israel and Gaza. “All our choices have been made to reflect and confront us in the present, not to say: look what they did then; “Instead, it’s what we’re doing now,” Glazer said. “Our film shows where dehumanization reaches its worst. It has shaped all of our past and present.”
Glazer, who is Jewish, added: “Right now, we stand here as men refuting their Judaism and the Holocaust, hijacked by an occupation that has led to conflict for many innocent people,” Glazer said, pausing briefly for applause.
He continued: “Whether it was the victims of October 7 in Israel or the ongoing attack on Gaza, all the victims of this dehumanization. How do we resist?”
Glazer then dedicated the film’s victory to Alexandria, a 90-year-old woman he met while working on the film and who inspired one of the film’s main characters. Area of interest.
Reaction to Glazer’s speech was swift, though much of the early negative sentiment occurred because some news sites did not fully quote the British director, or because his quotes were taken out of context with the rest of his speech. Some people, incorrectly, took Glazer’s speech to mean that he was refuting his Judaism, not that he was refuting “the kidnapping of Jews and the Holocaust by the occupation that led to the conflict of many innocent people,” as he said in his speech.
MSNBC host Chris Hayes was quick to correct people who misquoted Glazer. “I see (several) people saying this about Glazer’s speech, and it’s clearly false,” Hayes tweeted, along with the full quote from Glazer.
“It’s worded a little strangely, but he clearly says that he refutes that his Judaism was raptured. “He does not refute his Jewishness,” Hayes added in a follow-up tweet.
However, several prominent Israeli and Jewish users on X criticized Glazer for his comments. “Jonathan Glazer is a self-hating Jew of the worst kind who is exploiting the Holocaust to openly attack Israel,” Michael Freund, an Israeli political activist who served as deputy communications director under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the 1990s, wrote on X. At the Oscars.”
Newsweek Opinion columnist Batya Ungar Sarjun, another writer who incorrectly quoted Glazer, wrote on By saying: “We stand here as men refuting their Judaism.”
Among a stream of quote tweets and responses to Ungar Sargon, Yona Lieberman, co-founder of IfNotNow, an American Jewish group that opposes the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, wrote on X: “You are lying about what they said by adding a period in the middle of the sentence. They meant “Clearly, they are refuting the way their Jewishness was hijacked. You are supposed to be a journalist.”
“Almost all of those who distort Glazer’s words are themselves Jews,” Lieberman tweeted on Monday. Can you imagine another minority group willing to lie about one of their own in order to maintain a status quo where an ethnostate can kill women and children with impunity?
“I’m thrilled,” Abraham Foxman, director emeritus of the Anti-Defamation League, said on Twitter Area of interest It won Best International Feature at the Oscars — but as a Holocaust survivor, I was shocked that the director would slap the memory of the more than a million Jews who died because they were Jewish by declaring that he was refuting his own Judaism. Shame on you.” However, Foxman’s tweet was criticized with a community note for taking Glazer’s quote out of context.
Likewise, conservative journalist John Podhoretz took Glazer’s comments out of context. “By saying he is refuting his Judaism on the world’s biggest stage five months after the attack on Israel, Jonathan Glazer has instantly made himself one of Judaism’s historical villains,” Podhoretz, editor of Commentary magazine, wrote on Twitter.
Also on Monday morning, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro, a staunch supporter of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, wasted no time in attacking Glazer, writing on X: “On Jonathan Glazer area of interest, You don’t see a single Jew. These are the best Jews, according to Glazer: the faceless victims screaming from afar. Ironically, he is the villain: picking trophies from the corpses of these nameless dead Jews while ignoring the living being slaughtered in the Gaza envelope by genocidal killers.
Glazer received some support from fellow Hollywood filmmakers. Jewish-American director Boots Riley was among Glazer’s prominent peers who tweeted his support on Sunday night. “Tribute to Jonathan Glazer. Not only has he spoken out against the atrocities in Gaza and said his film is about the present day – but I finally saw him Area of interest last night. since Under the skin He showed that you don’t have to wait (until) publication to learn sound design.
